Tuesday, February 10, 2009

The Microsoft iPod Parody

Ah... yes, that's right, the Microsoft iPod.

This great little video neatly illustrates many things I love about Apple's approach to creating and nurturing the customer experience, and many things I despise about Microsoft's approach to pushing product.

What is it?
This is a short multimedia piece presented as an instructional video showing how the Microsoft branding strategy might be applied to a competitor’s flagship product, the Apple iPod. As a piece of satire, the video’s comic quality lies in the unexpected presentation of a well-known product in a competing company’s packaging.

Function
The “makeover” sequence functions as a story-telling device which relies on our familiarity with both the Microsoft and the Apple brands to work. We already know each of these brands and we are already accustomed to their very different personalities. The process of applying the Microsoft packaging style to an Apple product challenges us to think more about the specific attributes inherent in each brand, why they are at odds with each other and what that says about the markets they target. This is what makes the piece work – once we’ve stepped out of being merely consumers and paused to think about it, there is an invitation to decide which market we’d prefer to belong with.

Source
I first saw this video on YouTube a few years ago and I watched it over and over and over. Even now, every time I watch this piece I notice little things I hadn’t noticed before. The accuracy and the detail is simply stunning. This juxtaposition of creative and conservative has long been the foundation of Apple’s marketing, more recently in the extensive series of Mac / PC TV commercials.


Style
Microsoft is all about business, function, detailed specification and conformity – this brand strategy is aimed squarely at the conservative mass market. The style is aggressive, commercial and leaves nothing to the imagination. The typography is dense and loud.
Apple on the other hand is about experience, form, convenience and innovation – this brand is aimed at the proud, the flamboyant and the creative. This style is minimalist, slick, cool and sharp, leaving us to make it our own. This typography is open, subdued and quiet.

Quality
While each style is vastly different from the other, the quality of both is extremely high.
The Microsoft style demands dedication, technical expertise and time to write, develop and review the written and graphical content and then utilise every available square centimetre of space to deliver every last agonising detail.
Equally, the Apple style demands dedication, creative expertise and time to develop, refine and simplify the content and then deliver this message as efficiently and cleanly as possible.

Why do I like it?
This video piece is fast, snappy and most importantly, very, very clever. Whatever your personal opinions about the two companies and their products, most would acknowledge this piece as a poignant social commentary on the nature of consumerism. There are few better examples of the divide between the creative and the conservative.

As for me, call me a MacAddict, an iSnob, whatever you like... I’m proud of it!

:)

1 comment:

  1. Jenks was too shy to post comments on my blog (or maybe too kind) so I've copied last night's exchange across from Facebook...

    Sorry Jenks!

    ---
    Michael Jenkin at 20:19 on 10 February
    You apple fanboys are like walking advertisements for that pop culture ipod garbage. :D
    ---
    Andrew MacFarlane at 23:05 on 10 February
    Get the full story here... http://picklemegrandmother.blogspot.com/
    :)
    ---
    Michael Jenkin at 23:22 on 10 February
    "As a piece of satire, the video’s comic quality lies in the unexpected presentation of a well-known product in a competing company’s packaging." ... Yeah, I *get* it. After the laughter subsides i'll have to go and blindly follow a brand thats become so 'trendy' its consumers will draw sides of loyalty based soley on marketing and design concepts. Kapow!
    ---
    Andrew MacFarlane at 23:35 on 10 February
    I rebut thee... you assume too much! "Blindly follow" is a bit harsh don't you think? Is it that far-fetched that Apple loyalists have chosen their loyalties based on quality of product? And what of their will to go against the tide of the mass market? This is not 'blind' following, it is a clear choice! Plus, with such a minimalist style across all the marketing and design concepts, what else is there to sway the consumer but the quality of the product? Better let the product sell itself than to have to force-feed the consumer at the sales desk! And another thing, Microsoft loyalists are genuinely disappointed and frustrated with their choice consistently from year to year but they do not change... why? Fear. But that's not blindly following, now it isn't... right.
    ---
    Andrew MacFarlane at 23:36 on 10 February
    by the way, put your comments on the blog! its all food for thought....
    ---
    Andrew MacFarlane at 23:43 on 10 February
    Oh yeah, and for another view on "loyalty based solely on marketing and design concepts" see:
    http://movies.apple.com/movies/us/apple/getamac/apple_getamac_bakesale_20081020_480x272.mov
    ---
    Michael Jenkin at 00:02 on 11 February
    you're right it did sound (unintentionally) harsh after i wrote it - im not batting for any particular side (non freudian) but i think its incredible the way that apples marketing has been so successful that even people i know (one of my housemates included) will come home from work and tell me about how much more awesome his mac became that day. I can't seem to get apple ads out of my fuc**ng face no matter where i go. Regardless of the quality of the product. I guess should start charging people advertising fees for hosting promotional material within conversations they have with me.
    ---
    Michael Jenkin at 00:04 on 11 February
    Not to mention YOU just tricking me into seeing that ad as if it were some essay! Disgust!
    ---
    Michelle Frantom at 06:55 on 11 February
    You're all techno-tragics! Just remember who is supposed to be serving whom.
    ---

    ReplyDelete